64Digits

How long until we nuke North Korea?

Posted by HeroofTime55 on Oct. 10, 2006, 2:12 p.m.

How long do you think it will be until we (America) start a war on North Korea? And how long do you think it will take for liberals to then claim "It's all Bush's fault"?

Anyway, I'm getting the feeling JakeX is never going to get back to me on that highscore table.

The PM system here should also have an Outbox, and an ability to see if the PMs you send have been read by their recipients.

So, what do you think Google is going to do with Youtube?

&lt/randomness&gt

Comments

DS 18 years, 3 months ago

Quote:

Dont be a dumbass, please. The US dosen't act like we want to launch nukes at everyone we don't like. Countries like NK and Iran do. It would be ignorant and irresponsible for the "Big Bad United States" to not enforce international regulations, being one of a few nations capable of doing so.

You, if anyone, is a dumbass. First of all, the world isn't just going to degrade into Defcon. There's a little thing called MAD, I'd suggest you learn a little about it before continuing. That being said, as bad as nuclear proliferation is, how can we deny others the right to have what we have. Was that not one of the founding principles of this country? "No taxation without representation". The British were trying to rule where they didn't have a real right to. The same is occuring here. Just because you seem to be all patriotic happy flags waving everywhere doesn't mean you can't step back and see how hypocritical this society has become.

Eternal 18 years, 3 months ago

We're not going to go to war with North Korea, because they are not a Muslim country. Bush would much rather fight for Jesus.

thernz 18 years, 3 months ago

We need a Hindu president. >: (

Cesar 18 years, 3 months ago

No, we need a non-Protestant president

HeroofTime55 18 years, 3 months ago

DS, Its not the fact that they can't have it. If they didnt go about saying that they would launch it at people, there would be no problem. Its not that they have it, its what theyre planning to do with it.

Are you that stupid that you can't see the difference? :/

SleepinJohnnyFish 18 years, 3 months ago

DS, you've now proven twice in one blog that you don't know much about the government or history in general. Don't talk about "No Taxation Without Representation" if you don't even understand what it was about. Also, America is in no way trying to stop people from making nuclear weapons in an attempt to be the only one with them. There are certain guidelines by which countries are to be allowed to create nuclear weapons, and North Korea is not abiding by those rules. They are set up by the UN, not the US, so get off your fucking high-horse and stop pretending you understand our current situation.

The North Korean leader is a problem, and he'll most likely be the next big leader to be taken out of power… and although many UN representing countries will partake in the action, I'm sure the US will be blamed for the whole fucking thing.

DS 18 years, 3 months ago

Yes, decapitating other governments is perfectly decent! Let's just go weave a path of conquest across the world and set up a bunch of useless puppet states! Sounds like that is an ethical plan to me!

"Our current situation" is that other people want to have what we have. Big deal, they should have a right to that. No one should have nuclear weapons, but it is better for more countries to have them (once again, MAD) then for only a few superpowers to have them.

Quote:

I was unaware you are the ultimate authority on all North Korean tactical and military strategies. Until you are, I suggest you refrain from stating that North Korea is going to start a game of Defcon on us. Also consider that threats are far different from actual actions.

Not to mention that there is only one country that has ever used a nuclear weapon on another. Do you have any idea which one that might happen to be?

Eternal 18 years, 3 months ago

Quote:

It would be ignorant and irresponsible for the "Big Bad United States" to not enforce international regulations

Funny you should say that, because, by international regulations, the War on Iraw is an illegal war.

Also, DS, we've had non-protestant presidents. I believe there was a Catholic or two.

And DS, we all know that Sweden was the only country that used a nuke. Duh, it's like, first grade!

DS 18 years, 3 months ago

Quote:

Also, DS, we've had non-protestant presidents. I believe there was a Catholic or two.

I never said that was not true. I am fully aware that John F. Kennedy existed.

SleepinJohnnyFish 18 years, 3 months ago

Quote:

They are allowed to have them if they follow the guidelines. They just don't want to wait that long and go by procedure. You wave MAD around like a fucking encyclopedia, as if you actually understand the international laws behind this process, but you obviously don't, since you seem the think that the UN just wants to keep power to countries like the US. Oh, and I love how you imply that the US is the big pusher in North Korea. You <i>do</i> know that we're not the ones imposing the laws, right? That's the UN's job, and we only <i>represent</i> them in our messages. They are the backing, not us.