First Sony, now Nintendo…
Furrealz, who's next, Microsoft? Activision? EA?Anyone can be haxxed. The world is gonna end, all of our PS3's, Wii, and 360's are gonna get haxxed and try to kill us all. D:We're all gonna die. ;_;
First Sony, now Nintendo…
Furrealz, who's next, Microsoft? Activision? EA?Anyone can be haxxed. The world is gonna end, all of our PS3's, Wii, and 360's are gonna get haxxed and try to kill us all. D:We're all gonna die. ;_;
E3 this year wasn't that great so far.
Nothing really new announced so far in terms of games for each console. I guess they must be getting prepared for Next gen games.I think it's too soon for next gen crap already.Nintendo is announcing their next console tomorrow.
Sony's presentation wasn't bad. The Vita is kinda neat with the rear touch pads.
@Kabob
I hope that it doesn't have shit ps1 quality graphics like the Wii.Considering the Gamecube had > ps2 graphics, I don't think that will be an issue. But yes, rumors are that it will at the very least be a bit better than ps3/360.
Oh, is Nintendo finally coming into HD? They only missed the boat by…6 years. =P
The gamecube is slightly more powerful than PS2, the wii is obviously more powerful than the gamecube…
PS1 graphics? Surely you jest!
No really, the PS1 seemed only slightly less blocky than the 64. Graphics have come a long way since then, even for Nintendo. Examples? Super Mario Galaxy, Metroid, Rune Factory.(and that is to JID)Actually as far as last gen goes, it was gamecube>xbox>ps2 in terms of graphical power. But I think devs had an easier time using the xbox's power. Though as with the wii, the gamecubes power was only truly used in a few games like twilight princess (which is often seen as an example of wii graphics, which is kinda sad).
There's also the fact that Xbox and PS2 had a larger disc to accommodate higher resolution textures and models, as well as higher definition soundtracks.
Hardware-wise, Gamecube was definitely if not par then definitely near the xbox's graphical capabilities.