A friend and I got the idea of a website for any sort of development projects, so I've made a bunch of mockups over the last few months. In chronological order…
I doubt the site will ever go up, but that's not really the point.
I like the first mockup the best.This could conceivably be an awesome website. You could have different tabs under the project page, for like the blog, and one for artwork where people could go and look at concept art and assets that are published. And anyone participating in the project can post on the project page.Dang, I want this to exist, now.Good job.
The first one looks really nice, though I find the attempt at some kind of 3D at the bottom overkill. Furthermore, the sidebars are so small that 80% of all titles can't be displayed completely. You gotta agree with me that's a bit weird. Alternatively you could make the titles span several lines.
The second one has too much 3D making it look like a website for kids.The third one is kind of meh-ish but I don't really know why. It's too bland?Also, using an R instead of 'er' is so unoriginal :3 (just saying it because I've done it as well, and also tumblr, flattr, snipplr, stickr…)
I agree with Xemic on the pseudo-3D. As for the second one, the shades create an unnecessary contrast with the background, so yeah, agreeing with Xemic again. I don't really mind the third one but it looks very "vertical", which seems like a waste of space.
Quote:
Web 2.0 demands R's.
It makes it look like the Internet is run by Vikings speaking in Old Norse (draugr, Jörmungandr, etc.).I wonder what the text about Occidental is doing as a lorem ipsum.
Heheh, them comments.
I like the first mockup the best.This could conceivably be an awesome website. You could have different tabs under the project page, for like the blog, and one for artwork where people could go and look at concept art and assets that are published. And anyone participating in the project can post on the project page.Dang, I want this to exist, now.Good job.The first one looks really nice, though I find the attempt at some kind of 3D at the bottom overkill. Furthermore, the sidebars are so small that 80% of all titles can't be displayed completely. You gotta agree with me that's a bit weird. Alternatively you could make the titles span several lines.
The second one has too much 3D making it look like a website for kids.The third one is kind of meh-ish but I don't really know why. It's too bland?Also, using an R instead of 'er' is so unoriginal :3 (just saying it because I've done it as well, and also tumblr, flattr, snipplr, stickr…)Web 2.0 demands R's.
Oh how influential you are, 64digits.
I dislike leaving out nouns as well, but I'd rather do that than have to spend 1300$ on a domain-name.
I agree with Xemic on the pseudo-3D. As for the second one, the shades create an unnecessary contrast with the background, so yeah, agreeing with Xemic again. I don't really mind the third one but it looks very "vertical", which seems like a waste of space.