Please tell me I'm not insane.

Posted by death on Nov. 29, 2011, 12:03 p.m.

I take onsite courses at college, however I still end up with so much online work to do… i swear there are some problems that they programmed false answers for. like this one:

what do you's think?

there's also this one, which seemed like it didn't offer a valid answer so i randomly guessed:

the answer they say is correct still doesn't seem right to me.

Comments

DesertFox 12 years, 11 months ago

The very very very simple answer to why no. 7 was wrong is pretty much what Kenon said. (Which was basically that 1 + 1 = 2, not 3, for consecutive integers)

Also, the question itself is flawed in that no 3 consecutive odd integers can add up to 386 and in fact no 3 odd integers at all can ever add up to 386, because 3 odd integers always sum up to another odd integer. How come nunya bitches caught that? >:( 64d I am disappoint! EDIT kilin got it. IM PROUD SON

To expand your equation, lets assume the target sum is 9. Obviously, this is 1 + 3 + 5 (3 consecutive integers). In this case, your x is going to be 1. But if you use your selected equation, the result would be 1 + (1+1) + (1+3) or 1 + 2 + 4, which A) is definitely not the answer, and B) doesn't even add up to 9.

Protip: An easy way find the three consecutive odd integers it is to simply take the full sum, divide it by three to get the middle number, and then add/subtract two to get your other numbers (Or you can divide by 3 and subtract 2 to get your x)

Lets use 387, which actually works. Divide it by 3, you get 129, add/subtract 2 to get 127 and 131, and voila! Your 3 consecutive odd numbers are 127, 129, and 131.

Castypher 12 years, 11 months ago

I was about to slappedeth you, DF, but the tinytext hath saved you for now.

Toast 12 years, 11 months ago

Quote:
VVV UPVOTE DIS SHIT VVV
I have no recorded proof of this ever working on 64d.

I am proud of you all, you contrarians, you.

Rolf_Soldaat 12 years, 11 months ago

@Death, what I meant was: whe left side of the equation is always odd, yet they claim the right side of the equation is even (386), which is impossible.

death 12 years, 11 months ago

okay i get why no.7 is wrong now. i had gotten confused because the common questions i answered in my text book for homework assignments didn't ask for this the same way. my professor prepared me for a totally different question which never came up in this assignment at all. the two questions are similar and therefor i without even thinking selected the one with odd numbers being added to x.

as for no.15… i still don't get it. also just to point out again; the answer i chose is NOT what i believe in; the answer i got was not in the select-able answers so i chose one randomly.

EDIT: actually testing out their answer for 15 gives me the same value that my equation (note: not the one i chose) gives me… hmm so if i had actually tested the equations and gotten the value i would have realized which one was the right answer… lulz.