JOSH=SISSY!

Posted by s on July 16, 2008, 7:34 a.m.

THIS JUST IN JOSH IS A SISSY

Yes, that's right, JOSH IS A SISSY!

Why? Because he won't convert for({a=0;b=1};a<5;{a+=1;b-=1}){show_message(string(a)+" "+string(b))} into a a=0;b=1;while(a<5){show_message(string(a)+" "+string(b));a+=1;b-=1}

(If you do not believe, put it into GM yourself)

So ya, I might never use for{}, but that's beside the point. The point is that JOSH IS A SISSY!

Now you know, SPREAD WORD!

We can't let him get away for being A SISSY!

(Credit where credit is due, Bryan showed me this quirk of GM)

K, message spread. You are dismissed. Unless you want to read about stuff like how the water meter reading I took this morning was 2222

Bryan, that language is Lisp. That language is beautiful, and Josh hates it with a passion. It is a language of simple syntax and is a case where it is preprocessor, compiler and scripting language

Carnage Hearts is crazy. Beautiful AI system, I found it while rereading the Wikipedia article on Befunge (Yes, I really do reread Wikipedia articles, and I've probably rereread a few. Can't say I've done much rererereading (Well, full rererereading))

Anyways, blah blah blah you I me no maybe, PY got the whole wrap learned finally. So I'll stop blabbering about my lost identity that you're trying to steal from me. I'll have to move on from that rut

Because you see, we are we. This statement is most certainly true, and it is how it should be seen. Built up are cells (which vary in some areas), to which their collection make us (One may be more precise and go over organs). But are we the final product on the line? No, we are simply the first sentient being on the line

(I'll assume anything that can question existence is sentient, so some humans aren't sentient, but still)

So anyways, from MEs we make WEs, and these prove more complex. Making comparisons of a human anatomy to the higher level anatomy is like making a comparison of the human anatomy to the cell's anatomy. You might find some things, but it won't get the whole thing. Where does this chain end? Just as the cell sacrifices itself for the good of the human body, the self should sacrifice itself for the good of the social body

Of course, cells aren't sentient. But I believe society is more sentient than self, and we should work to empower it in evolving beyond our short lives

Comments

Cesar 16 years, 7 months ago

TWO FRONTED BLOGS IN A WEEK BY SERPREX?

MADNESS!

RabeArcade 16 years, 7 months ago

L.I.S.P. = Littered In Stupid Parenthesis

Actually, I love working in Lisp… no matter how ugly it may be.

s 16 years, 7 months ago

Ya, Lisp is neat. Still, I can't disagree when it comes to the superior awesome of Python

As for the madness, tis not my madness, but that of Josh's. We must (And I exagerate by no margin when I say must) demand he convert multistatement for{}s into while{}s

biggoron 16 years, 7 months ago

But wai?

And they're not equivalent, the variables in the while version have more scope than those in the for version.

biggoron 16 years, 7 months ago

Also while loops can go suck a big fat cocksickle mainly 'cause GCC is too stupid to optimize while(true) into a jmp instruction but it will for for(;;)

s 16 years, 7 months ago

You're thinking in C. GM doesn't really have scopes, besides var. But yes, then there is a scopting issue with Enigma. Still, for({};;{}) is valid GML syntax and Josh planned to follow GML syntax. Even if he skips out on functions that don't apply, he should be beaten to his word on syntax

And you're reasoning against GCC doesn't apply in this case. I doubt one would go for({};;{}){}

Cesar 16 years, 7 months ago

thanks for stretching the page, Onii

[deleted user] 16 years, 7 months ago

My mistake

Quote:
There was a joke back in the 80s when Reagan's SDI program was in full

swing that someone stole the Lisp source code to the missile interceptor

program and to prove it he showed the last page of code…

))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))…

Mu6502 16 years, 7 months ago

Sissy? Ooo Sissy Spacek the actor.I thought you were great in Carrie by the way.