For those who don't know what it is, you take a test which categorizes you into a type based on your dominant traits, which are either:
Extroverted or IntrovertedSensing or IntuitionThinking or Feeling Judging or PerceivingYou can take the test here: http://www.mypersonality.info/personality-types/Of course it isn't perfect, being an online quiz. I find that I could answer some of the questions either way depending on the context of it and my mood at the time. I think it's meant to show how you process information, and what they can infer from that.My result was INTP. I find that I can relate well to a lot of things said about their personalities. But I am awful at maths, when INTPs are knows as the engineers. Something else I wanted to talk about was religion. I am curious about what you believe. I have always been a Christian but having philosophised about things, I'm pretty much borderline agnostic but I am not comfortable about leaving my faith altogether. I'm kind of vague about it now, I say things that seem logical to me, but it doesn't line up with my faith. I suppose it would have to do with my open-ended 'perceiving' trait, with the more rational 'NT' part of me. The Ne (extroverted intuition) and the P would make me more likely to see things from different perspectives, and say things with a type of detachment. There was a profile that articulated this better than I, but I suppose it's useless saying that since I am too lazy to look for it. Okay, that was just me rambling. …I thought I may as well add this: And no, my name is not Eunice >.< It's my internet name that I use sometimes when signing up for things.
I'm atheist. I don't believe in god or any other of such. It just seems…illogical.
Interesting. I think you may just find that the majority of people interested in GM and communicating their thoughts and ideas on it, just might mostly fit easiest in this INTP category. I don't think INTP is just maths, it can be science, rationalism, art, music, etc.I don't like this kind of categorizing. Any psychologists I've read about have all said these kind of tests are just silly estimations, trying to make shallow logic out of something they don't understand, the brain. Like the "left and right sides represent two distinct abilities" thing, its a decent approximation, but its mostly bullshit. So don't live by it. It's completely possible that you'll be entirely, genuinely different in 10 years.As for religion, I am atheist. Technically, you might say I'm agnostic, although I don't think any of the traditional religions reasonable. I don't think you can deny the possibility of some sort of God, but then again, you can't deny there being a last number in infinity, or that you're currently in the world of The Matrix. It's the fact its just so improbable, theres no point of living by it. If you live a good life, theres an equal chance you were meant to live it badly.If you're afraid of seeming to disobey your family by not being Christian, don't be, my family are Irish Protestants, so they're pretty strong about it, and I just refused to go to church or get confirmed. It's more political anyway, they don't care about God while they're threatening to kill each other. I feel sorry for the really strict Christian kids, like the kind in weird sects or who talk about God all the time. They've been indoctrinated into religion by their parents for so long they're afraid to think straight.
INTJ for me and with an IQ of 156, the future looks bright. I'd imagine most people on this site would be introverted and thinkers, leaving INTJ, INTP, ISTP and ISTJ to be the most common.
I got INTP as well. What a surprise.I also did that multiple intelligence test. Verbal/Lingustic->Mathematical/Logical->Musical. Makes sense.–I'm a Christian, and I'm happy with my faith. I find it hard to believe that everything happened in some huge accident.I have a problem with evolution, because I refuse to see humans as animals. Sure, we've all got hearts and flesh and lungs and stuff, but humans are fundementally different. We act on free will, and rational thought. They act on instinct.I also have a problem with the big bang, because no-one can tell me where "the two huge things that crashed into each other" came from.–Regarding The Matrix, I wonder, if we're in a computer system in the real world, could the real world be in a computer system in the real world, which is actually in a computer system in the real real world, which…Is there a real world? And if so, what's it like? Are people five dimensional there?
Oh I did that intelligence thingy as well, I'm Logical/Verbal/Physical. Yes that's right. There's a jock amongst you. Prepare to be wedgied into next week, nerds! Nah, just really like climbing and hiking.
Frankly, if we were extroverted then we'd be outside playing with each other in a totally non-sexual way. It's not that I'm a social reject, no no, it's just that I prefer to be inside where it's warm and musical.In terms of this whole God debate, I'll wade in all theological munitions flailing once I've cooked my lunch.@flak3r: Good, I am happy for you.
Evolution wouldn't really make us animals. Even if we were, it would not devalue us. We are fundamentally different to the animals though, you have a point. I suppose atheists would have to believe that mysteries such as that will be solved someday through science. But something coming from nothing sounds unscientific. So does saying God did it, but I suppose that's why they call it faith. I guess it depends on your subjective experience and personal convictions. Regarding your thoughts on the matrix, it's one of those unfathomable things.. Mortal beings cannot comprehend what eternity means..@ Juju: Okay, haha :)
I wonder if I'd be smarter or stupider if I were more extroverted. Stupider as in a ditzy social butterfly who is too preoccupied with relationships and events to have intellectual pursuits, or smarter as in more assertive and quick-witted, with more life experience.We act on free will? Is that true, or again, are we just simplifying what we don't understand? Free will is just the illusion that we had a choice. Just like when you program a game's "brain", our brain works by laws and rules.
In a game, you can always work out what's going to happen in the next frame. There is no "random". It is the same in the real world. You can't make a "free will" decision, just like you can't make a "random" number. In games, we have pseudo-random number generators, and there's a fairly similar illusion that happens in your head to make you think you have free choice.Of course, this assumes the foundations of all mathematics are correct… Which of course, they might not be. Then there is all that sub-atomic stuff that does seem random… but I don't know, someone here probably knows a hell of alot more about it then I do.Also, one thing people misinterpret about evolution, is that somehow the species was "trying to survive" or "evolved because it needed to". Which is wrong. Evolution is just cold, unemotional science. We exist because we do.But I'm just a 15yo who likes Philosophy class… :P