Motion sensors are just a gimmick. A gimmick that gets too old too soon. I don't care from what company it is, what color it is or what name its got, it'll be fun(ny) for the first few days after purchase and afterwards it'll collect dust in the living room except for when you get visit at home that stopped playing videogames after the Playstation 2 came out and want to try it out.

You'll then realize that deep down you bought it "for teh lulz".

Also, from a business viewpoint, Sony and Microsoft are rather late to the motion-sensing thing. Even if their products blow the Wii's away, people already have experience with motion-sensing controllers, and if they're trying to get casuals in, remember that people have bought more Wii consoles than games. Why would they buy that other console if they've got the Wii, that does the same? (I'm guessing that's what Wii-owning casual players will think when they see a PS3 move or Xbox360 kinect advertisement)

I didn't watch the video btw.

This motion stuff coming from MS and Sony is destined to fail, why? Because it's not an integral part of the console, it's an addon, and as such they have a little problem: most people won't buy them until many games support it, and most developers won't develop for them until many people have it. In the end very few people buy the addon and very few games come out that actually use it.

Look at the WiiMotion Plus, more precise and everything, yet it's been a year already and there are too few games making use of it.

You can't play FPS with them. Only the mouse has enough sensitivity. <_<

Playstation Move looks a whole hell of a lot better than Wii's motion or Kinect. Would enjoy playing an FPS with it.

Plus, that guy looks like a realistic hatless Mario. COINCIDENCE?

I agree with this, but I believe it depends on the person. I know people that are great with console shooters, but blow at PC shooters.

Analog sticks have a force in proportion to the amount it is pushed from the center, making the force necessary to move the cursor around variable. Mice have constant force needed to move it around, given a consistent surface it is on.

Just depends on what you're used to.

http://www.rahulsood.com/2010/07/console-gamers-get-killed-against-pc.html

Mouse is just a far more accurate, responsive, and efficient input than a joystick.

In RawrSpoon's words, move mouse over target's head, click.

I hate the Wii's pointer, and I can't say Move's is going to be any less annoying. So for the love of God, bring back the keyboards we type on with our analog sticks, and not the ones we have to find and click with a stupid shaky remote.

That's me! :D (Well I'm pretty good at PC FPSes…) I agree, pointing with the wii is terribly annoying, but if they are able to write out full words perfectly on the Move, then maybe aiming won't be so bad.

I agree with Josea, it being an add on makes it difficult for this to succeed, but seeing how much the Move controllers have about the same button layout, games are probably going to integrate alternate controls for both the Dualshock and Move.

I certainly agree with this, but all and all it's a motion controller, something the Wii is being shunned for. Then again maybe this will pick up all the disappointed Wii players?

I agree with this as well, well sort of, They have been a gimmick on the Wii, where it was inaccurate and simply wanted you to do similar motions instead of actually tracking you, thus resulting in crappy minigames. If this works out it could contend with your regular controller, or it could just be another way to make you do stupid stuff like point at an audience to make them stand up and cheer.

If you are trying to figure out what side I'm on, I'm really just throwing in my 2 cents to see what you guys will respond with. I don't intend on buying this until it settles and game developers can really make this hardware work. If it ends up bundled with KZ3 and I still don't have it, then I would definitely buy it.