Eh, not really, they are more or less the same in terms of supported features, with some differences obviously, it's just that the UE3 engine demonstration is a better demonstration than the CryEngine 3 demo, although again, they're focused on different things.
Still, either way that is a rather specy demo there.
Yeah, that is one thing, whilst the engines are similar (probably more or less equal), the UE3 demo definitely impresses more than the CryEngine 3 demo. I guess for more technically proficient audiences, not to say you lot aren't, but I'm refering to AAA developers, they would be the types that would probably be more impressed with the stuff in the CE3 demo than most other people would be. Then again, they would probably be more impressed with what was in the UE3 demo too.
Most CryEngine demos have been of things we can do, wheras the UE3.9 demos are the upper limit of what it can achieve. Of course that's going to be more impressive, visually. CE3 supports a lot more than what's currently been used in games and demos, for example - and many of them are runnable in Crysis 2! If you enable the lot, a single top-end card gets about 4fps. Which is the problem, the UE3.9 demo isn't reasonably runnable yet.
lol…it really does doesn't it.
Maeks me feel slightly happy ^_^I've got to make a game using UDK one day, but first I've got to get a Computer powerful enough to run it.
Not enough RAM?
Or not-good-enough video card. : /My video card sucks.
Eh, not really, they are more or less the same in terms of supported features, with some differences obviously, it's just that the UE3 engine demonstration is a better demonstration than the CryEngine 3 demo, although again, they're focused on different things.
Still, either way that is a rather specy demo there.I tried to find a better vid for CryEngine, but I couldn't, most of them were pretty short and didn't show much/anything interesting.
Yeah, that is one thing, whilst the engines are similar (probably more or less equal), the UE3 demo definitely impresses more than the CryEngine 3 demo. I guess for more technically proficient audiences, not to say you lot aren't, but I'm refering to AAA developers, they would be the types that would probably be more impressed with the stuff in the CE3 demo than most other people would be. Then again, they would probably be more impressed with what was in the UE3 demo too.
=/Most CryEngine demos have been of things we can do, wheras the UE3.9 demos are the upper limit of what it can achieve. Of course that's going to be more impressive, visually. CE3 supports a lot more than what's currently been used in games and demos, for example - and many of them are runnable in Crysis 2! If you enable the lot, a single top-end card gets about 4fps. Which is the problem, the UE3.9 demo isn't reasonably runnable yet.
Both engines are spectacular, though.You don't need a video card to play my game, ;)
It's most impressive feature by far is its antialiasing support. I could live without the rest.