So, I was trying to find some things about the history of 64Digits, but I couldn't find anything on either 64D itself or Google (which is supposed to know *anything*).
When I joined in 2007 the website was already active and had quite some members. When was 64D launched? Who worked on the first version? And, seeing as there have never been advertisements on the website, or any option to donate, who has been paying for the host all that time? O.o I could figure it should be quite expensive to keep online over the years.Just curious.Because this entry would probably be too short, I'm going to tell something about a project I'm working on with a friend: The basic concept behind the project is location based content. Although I think it has been used since 2004, and services such as foursquare/gowalla/etc are becoming more popular, location based services aren't used *that* much yet.I started the project with a teacher at my school, in order to make something cool that pupils could use to learn something in a fun way. Recently I came into contact with some cool people who are working on projects that are well-known in the city I live in. They are partially responsible for the free wireless network we have in the city (as one of the first - if not the first - cities in the Netherlands), and they are very interested in location based media.So they asked us to come up with some ideas that people (and especially tourists) could use on their mobile phone. One of the obvious ideas is a GPS 'enhanced' city guide type of application, where you, as a tourist for example, get information about the place where you are, search for nearby restaurants… and so on.Information about (historical) buildings and restaurants could be nice for some people, but when you're using dynamic content to show what movies are playing in the cinema you're standing a few meters away from (just an example), I'm starting to wonder how useful location based content really is. How could the location based aspect 'enhance' information like this?Perhaps you guys have any ideas?
Touché. Thanks for your opinion though.
No, what is called v0 is v1, and what is called v1 is v1.5.
Or at least it has been like that since as long as I can remember.Apologies if I came up a little short, Lapixx, I had a bad day yesterday. Sorry I couldn't be more constructive.
That's alright. You were right anyway.
I agree with that. The current design looks pretty nice, clean and simple, but 'unique'
Also, what's with the banner? It's pretty useless atm.Remove the banner and bung a 64D logo at the right of the menu bar, I say.
Oooh that would be splendid.
64d looks weird without a banner.