I read an article a couple of months ago about the issue of patent infringements concerning videogames in EDGE magazine (E165).
Quote:
RIM (Research In Motion) is the wireless solutions manufacturer behind the popular Blackberry wireless platform, and its protracted legal battle with patent-holding company NTP represents such a low point in patent law’s chequered past that it’s seen by some observers as a potential catalyst for widespread reform. It is, in fact, a trolling masterclass. “These companies have no intention to create a product. â€?All they intend to do is exploit companies that do make consumer products, and that’s wrong from any angle you look at it.â€? Founded by Thomas Campana Jr, a communications engineer who owned eight 1991 patents related to the transmission of emails through paging networks, NTP’s sole function was to administer and economically exploit those patents, which it did over four years at the expense of alleged patent-infringer RIM, culminating in an out-of-court settlement of over 600 million. AVG (American Video Graphics), meanwhile, acquired a series of patents filed in 1987 by William G. Waller of innovations company Tektronix, Inc. Two of these, brought in 2004, had particularly far reaching implications for common console development practices, and the company proceeded to sue 12 separate publishers for infringement. The primary technology involved was that of spherical panning – a camera movement and zoom technique in which the camera moves around a specific focal object. In its case against Sega, the company’s lawyers cited Super Monkey Ball 2 as an offending example. Recent financial filings by Atari, meanwhile, disclosed an AVG-related settlement of $300,000.
Yeah. Geez, a restraining order? That would really suck, for us as well as Nintendo.
Interlink is just doing that to get paid out of court, from what I can tell they really dont have much of an argument.
Plus notice how they waited until the wii was nice and popular so it would help them get publicity.Interlink filed their patent only a few months before President Iwata of Nintendo, revealed the new controller at the 2005(2006?) Tokyo Game Show.
My bet is that Interlink found someone inside Nintendo to give enough details about the contoller to file a patent related to its design.they should really make a law where the patent must be around a year to five years old before they can sue for patent infringement, as development of the Wii Remote began MUCH earlier than the patent
Interlink has a weak case.
true that is, as it is for point and CLICK, not meant for the wii remote, plus, the wii remote has many more functions, so interlink's case is VERY weak