My reasoning?
Say that there exists a problem of the verify being O(n) and the finding being O(n2)So then the increase in complexity results in O(n2)Why shouldn't it in some other problem result in O(2n)?Also, the problems are not equivalent. The verification problem is a problem related to the output of the solver. This is not equivalentSay, perhaps, the sub sum problem. The verification is NP if we ask if the sum of the values' factorials are 0So then, we can look at data access. Again, the sub sum problem. The issue of verification is taking the interrelated value of the whole set. The verification has nothing to do with subsets. The finding issue has to search all the subsetsBesides, let us assume it is a sub div problem. The verification need only divide all the elements in order. The problem is whether the division of all the elements is equal to one of the elements of the set. Meanwhile, due to x/y!=y/x, the search for such a set must include more of the permutations of the set. This would require an NP algorithm and thus a verification problem for such a must be NP problem could be made P
I do not understand.
Deary me.uhh, yes what is this about?
P!=NP
lulz clicks here
I see somebody wants to be a millionare
I see nobody feels like explaining to me where I've made an obvious flaw which I'm incapable to see. I've an interest to understand this problem for what it is worth. My current knowledge of the subject must be lacking for my current conclusions to be made, and a problem deemed with such importance should be studied
I suppose my lack of spaces on operators could cause issue, I expect anyone who would think it a factorial would understand my meaning though
Haha, true, true.
lol?